yah it's taken out of context, the title I mean. All he's saying is the additional year for developers is better....DUH, like we can't figure that out.
another Captain obvious. Plus he does say GOW is the best looking game so far, even running of 1/3 of 360's CPU. So really he's supporting the 360 far more than the PS3. Any console with almost an additional year will have better developed games.
halo 3 was a 100% ingame.....why
Because in the making of that trailer they showed you rotate 360 degrees around master chief and the objects he walks around. Something you couldn't do with MGS4 or assassins creed because those are cutscenes.
Also Halo 3 has almost another year on it so it will look much better.
1.26 billion si lunch money to bill gates. Their windows and media profit barrels over anything like this.
we have no idea, all they've shown us is a proven CGI trailer.
nVidia bashing ATI, old story. Also we've got a HD-DVD drive coming, and we will get a bigger hard drive in the future so why fret.
You DON'T need anything over 20gbs for a game for years and years. Probably only a couple in 3 years will be close to 15gbs.
this is on the XBOX 360 too
demo sucked big time
probably a small error that's come to their attention. PSP is such a pain on your hands trying to move around and such. Jagged edges and ill-placed buttons.
bad attitude kiwi, everyone must act like a fanboy and talk out of their arse if you want to reach 1000 comments.
I don't understand how people are getting so excited about this game. The trailer at E3 was just like MGS4....CUTSCENE, and not what you'll actually see in the game. Or as some call it ingame.
Still I'm excited to see what happens but how can a cutscene hype trailer impact so many people this deep.
700th comment, we're going for the record whatever it may be
LAME, quit pressing your luck Nintendo and just release the specs, price, and date.
OOOOO....a secret encoded!!! (sarcasm)
trust me they'll make the 2006 deadline. Even think of their tagline, emergence day 2006. You have to live up to that.
How about this...
Sony not letting Raw on their console in order to give the developing more time and get better graphics. Therefore they could say that "hey look WWE looks better on the PS3 so it must be more powerful."
shadow, PS2 got such a big fanbase with the majority of those being casual gamers because the price was a reasonable 200$ with a respectable game library. The ps2 only sold their bulk of consoles when it reached 200. Which begs the question how successful is 600 gonna be. Even when it drops price to 400 in 2-3 years, what's that gonna look like when the 360 and Wii will be considerably less.
wow, a lot of errors and hearsay. What a lame article we've been through this how many times.
-first, 129$ lost per console is WRONG. They've sold 5 million, and MS's lost 414 million in Home and Entertainment total. Now consider the 360 to be a noticable but not major part of that peice of pie. If you divide them it's gonna say 80 per console but you know it's probably less than half that.
-Adding a game is the worst option for Microsoft, PGR3 sure but it's ...
for the cost of your rent this month
echo...echo...echo
this thread is empty
were you dropped on your head as a baby, if not you should of been.
"stupider"
"get your fact str8"
yeah, more cutscene crap. NOT what you'll see in the game....dullsville if you ask me. Same with Assassins creed.